3/2/2024 0 Comments Dodo bird actual picture“What, it is necessary to ask, accounts for the result that apparently diverse forms of psychotherapy prove successful in similar cases? Or if they are only apparently diverse, what do those therapies actually have in common that makes them successful?”.Let’s see what the research paper explicitly stated (excerpts): None would be especially greater or worse than the other. If you were to somehow score each therapeutic approach as to the final effectiveness, the idea is that they would all come to an equal or tie score. Some have referred to this as the tie score effect. The basic argument was that all psychotherapies might pretty much be the same and inevitably will end up producing the same or similar results. He made a proposal that was perceived as one of a rather cutting nature. The article was entitled “Some Implicit Common Factors In Diverse Methods Of Psychotherapy” by Saul Rosenzweig, The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1936. Saul Rosenzweig in a demonstrably famous research paper that ultimately caused earthquakes across the psychotherapy realm. The key kicker to all of this was first vividly broached in 1936 by Dr. In a Darwinian process, psychotherapy as a stipulated process might stridently ebb and flow as the times change. Another approach might come up with something new that prior approaches had not previously envisioned. You see, one particular approach might contain limitations or weaknesses that a different approach improves upon. I suppose that we would expect this back-and-forth kind of psychotherapy methodological horserace to naturally arise. A kind of winner-take-all gambit is often waged as to whether one specific method of therapy ought to prevail over some or all the others. An ongoing battle brews about which therapeutic approach is better than another. The odds are that if you spoke with zealous proponents of any particular psychotherapy, they would tout that it is the best of them all. Some have come and gone, and some have remained steadfast over many years. There are lots of different mental health therapies that you can choose from. The problem is popularly known as the Dodo bird verdict or the Dodo bird conjecture, and sometimes simply noted as the tie score effect. In some sense, the use of generative AI might substantially aid in resolving or at least shining new light on a longstanding acrimonious feud that has been taking place. Once I’ve covered the premise of the problem, we will shift to consider how generative AI might relate to the issue at hand. I am going to briefly take you inside the psychotherapy arena and introduce you to a vexing question or problem that has been the subject of intense debate since at least the 1930s. Let’s get underway on something that I think you will find of keen interest.Įxplaining The Dodo Bird Verdict Or Tie Score Effect The outcome might not be pretty.įor those reasons and a slew of additional considerations, digging into and unpacking the facets of generative AI and mental health across the board is a worthy endeavor and much needed. In that sense, the world is immersed in an experiment and all of us are the willing or unknowing guinea pigs. We do not know what the short-term and long-term effects will be of people using generative AI as their go-to for mental health guidance. (ii) Human mental health as experimental AI guinea pigs (i.e., sad face portrayal).Via the use of generative AI, the public at large can finally get ready access to mental health advisement at a low cost, whenever needed or desired, and no longer be bottlenecked by having to access human therapists that are sparsely available or pricey to utilize. (i) AI democratization of mental health treatment (i.e., happy face portrayal).In the context of mental health therapy, the dual-use AI provision can be characterized in these two disturbingly divergent ways:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |